📣 Gabriella Chatman, People Operations Manager @ Ygrene Energy Fund:
Situations like this can arise during organizational restructuring when there is still uncertainty about the most appropriate role for an employee. In some cases, it may also occur when an organization is considering termination but has not yet gathered sufficient documentation to support that decision.
Typically, HR will initiate a conversation with the employee and formally document the discussion. This documentation often includes various factors, such as the employee’s response to change, overall attitude, and adaptability during the transition period.
Additionally, the proposed change may be classified as a lateral move, meaning the employee’s title or responsibilities may change without a corresponding adjustment in compensation.
For additional context, it is helpful to understand whether the organization has recently undergone changes such as an acquisition, whether there have been any prior informal or formal performance-related write-ups, and whether this transition is part of a structured career development plan.
📣 Melissa Stough, HR Coordinator at Project Genesis:
I think the answer will vary depending on where you live. It's certainly allowable in many places for leadership to reorganize and restructure companies, moving individuals and entire departments, as it works for company goals and agendas. They don't need the employee's or department's permission to do that. They also don't need their permission to change job titles.
That being said, if you are not happy with these changes, you can try opening dialogue with your supervisors or HR about it. The worst that can happen is that nothing changes internally, and you know what to expect going forward. If that's the case, it may be time to move on to a new company.
📣 Alex White, Regional Director, HR @ Washington Duke Inn & Golf Club:
What you’re describing is more common than people realize, especially in larger organizations where restructuring, business needs, or leadership changes drive decisions.
From a legal and operational standpoint, in most cases an employer can reassign an employee to a different department or adjust responsibilities without formal consent - particularly if:
Your pay hasn’t been reduced
Your core employment status hasn’t fundamentally changed
There’s no specific contract limiting role changes
That said… “permissible” and “best practice” are not always the same thing.
A significant shift in responsibilities, leadership, and team - especially after years in a role - should ideally come with:
Clear communication about the why behind the change
A conversation (not just a notification)
Updated job expectations
Alignment on title, growth path, and long-term impact
If that hasn’t happened, it’s completely reasonable to seek clarity. You might consider asking:
What does success look like in this new structure?
Is this a temporary transition or a permanent role change?
When will the title and responsibilities formally align?
How does this impact my career progression?
At the end of the day, organizations need flexibility, but employees deserve transparency and alignment. This is less about whether they can do it, and more about how thoughtfully they’re doing it.
Safe Space members can join this discussion here. Not a member yet? Apply to join here.
