The Science and History of the iPhone Screen |
In 2007, one conversation convinced Steve Jobs to pick Corning and Gorilla Glass for the iPhone. |
|
|
Thanks for subscribing to SatPost.
Today, we are talking about the science and history behind the iPhone’s glass screen (manufactured by Corning). Also this week: - Elon Musk vs. Larry Page (on AI)
-
The NFL’s $19B business
- …and them fire memes (including Chobani yogurt)
PS. If you were forwarded this e-mail by a really cool friend or family member, you can subscribe here. |
Steve Jobs introduced the iPhone on January 9th, 2007. So much lore has come out of the keynote presentation but my favourite detail is that the screen on the iPhone that day was made of plastic. Why does that tickle my fancy? Because when the phone was shipped in June 2007, the screen was made of glass and the story of how that happened is one of the most insightful — and funniest — Jobs story ever.
It is also a great window into the science and history of Corning (the $27B industrial firm that specializes in glass and ceramics). So, let’s discuss: - iPhone going glass
- The history and science of Gorilla Glass
- The current state of Corning
|
iPhone going glass
While the iPhone launch demo was a success, Jobs was very unhappy with the plastic screen (which was similar to the iPod screen). His major gripe was that the keys in his pocket left scratch marks on the device.
The small iPhone team within Apple had previously tested glass and briefly attempted to develop materials in-house. But the screen kept cracking during drop tests.
In his book The One Device, Brian Merchant recounts a conversation Jobs had with a mid-level Apple executive, who you will feel sorry for after reading this exchange:
“Look at this,” [Jobs] said to a midlevel executive, holding up a prototype iPhone with scratch marks all over its plastic display—a victim of sharing his pocket with his keys.
“Look at this. What’s with the screen?” “Well, Steve,” the exec said, “we have a glass prototype, but it fails the one-meter drop test one hundred out of one hundred times—”
Jobs cut him off. “I just want to know if you are going make the fucking thing work.” Two things happened after this conversation: -
I can’t confirm but am guessing that no Apple employee ever started a conversation again with the words “Well, Steve” (Jobs’ response here is up there with the time he wanted the iPod to be made smaller but the engineering team told him it was impossible; so, Jobs took an iPod and dropped it in an aquarium and when the device floated to the top he said, “Those are air bubbles…that means there’s space in there…make it smaller.")
- Jobs wanted glass and the iPhone team had six months to deliver.
Enter Corning Inc, which was founded in 1851 as Corning Glass Works to…err work on glass.
In 2005, the company was monitoring the rise of high-end flip phones (e.g. Razr, Noika) and thought it could commercialize a scratch-resistant glass that was developed decades prior. The material was dubbed Gorilla Glass and filled a need for a consumer glass market that was “either too fragile and shatter-prone or too thick and unsexy”. Not long after the iPhone demo, Jobs met with Corning’s CEO Wendell Weeks to discuss Gorilla Glass and it was a next-level conversation. As Merchant explains: Jobs told Weeks he doubted Gorilla Glass was good enough, and began explaining to the CEO of the nation’s top glass company how glass was made.
“Can you shut up,” Weeks interrupted him, “and let me teach you some science?”
Jobs was sold, and, recovering his Jobsian flair, ordered as much as Corning could make—in a matter of months. “We don’t have the capacity,” Weeks replied. “None of our plants make the glass now.” He protested that it would be impossible to get the order scaled up in time.
“Don’t be afraid,” Jobs replied. “Get your mind around it. You can do it.”
According to [Walter Isaacson’s biography on Jobs], Weeks shook his head in astonishment as he recounted the story. “We did it in under six months,” he said. “We produced a glass that had never been made.”
Do you remember that awesome scene in The Martian, where Matt Damon’s character has to plant his own potatoes because he is stranded on Mars without enough food? And motivates himself by saying “I'm going to have to science the shit out of this?”
That was an awesome scene and line.
Well, I’m here to tell you that Weeks saying to Jobs “let me teach you some science” is a 1000x better use of the word “science” than Damon’s line and one of the greatest clap-backs in corporate history (on a related note: Gorilla Glass is about 1000x stronger than plastic).
Also, isn’t that the most Jobsian story ever? It hits all the notes of the Jobs mythology: - Total self-assurance (mixed with douchebaggery): “he…began explaining to the CEO of the nation’s top glass company how glass was made”
- Visionary: Jobs was willing to change his mind if convinced and — after being taught some science — he saw the potential of Gorilla Glass.
- Reality distortion field: “Don’t be afraid…get your mind around it, you can do it.”
That is the full Jobs experience right there. |
History and science of Gorilla Glass So, what science did Weeks — who is still Corning’s CEO — teach Jobs?
Let’s answer that question by looking at the OG way of strengthening glass. The process is called tempering and dates back hundreds of years. Here is the basic science as told by one of the top search results I found for “tempering glass”: Manufactured through a process of extreme heating and rapid cooling, tempered glass is much harder than standard glass. […]
The glass is heated in a furnace to over 1,000 degrees Fahrenheit and then quickly cooled using high-pressure air blasts. This cools the outer layers of the glass much more quickly than the internal layers, so when the inside cools, it pulls away from the outer layers. As a result, the inside remains in a state of tension, while the outside goes into a state of compression. These competing forces are what make tempered glass so much stronger than [standard] glass.
In the 1950s, Corning’s then president gave the company’s head of research a very literal assignment: “Glass breaks. Why don’t you fix that?” (I cross-checked this statement with multiple sources and can confirm that glass does indeed break) Corning’s research team delivered two breakthroughs over the next decade.
The first is called the “Fusion Draw” process. You can watch a 90-second video from Corning or just enjoy this stylized summary: -
Hot stuff in a big container: Corning engineers combine sand with other glass-making ingredients and heat the mixture to 1000 degrees Celsius.
-
Overflowing hot stuff: The molten glass lava goes into a suspended trough and flows over the sides.
-
Glass: The molten glass cools as it overflows, forming super-thin glass sheets in mid-air, which are then cut by machines.
Today, no human hands ever come into contact with the glass, even after it has cooled and is moved around. |
The second major solution — and one specific to Gorilla Glass — was to add chemicals to the glass-strengthening process, creating an effect known as an “ion exchange”.
This image below from Lehigh University explains the process: - Glass is treated with a chemical
- The chemical-treated glass has a lot of sodium molecules (Na+)
-
The chemical-treated glass is dipped in a chemical bath that has a lot potassium molecules (K+)
- Potassium molecules (K+) are heavier than sodium molecules (Na+) and replace those molecules in the glass.
- The larger potassium (K+) molecules create more compression and strengthen the glass
|
“[Corning] called the new glass Chemcor,” according to Merchant’s One Device. “It was much, much stronger than ordinary glass. And you could still see through it.”
Officially launched in the mid-1960s, Chemcor was a breakthrough but Corning could never find a market for the material. Some failed product launches included phone booths, eyeglasses and windshields (the glass was too strong for automakers because if a person’s skull goes flying into it after a car crash, the skull does not remain intact). The product remained untouched until Weeks taught Jobs some science. Corning took Chemcor off the shelf and collaborated with Apple to make it thin enough to be used as a smartphone screen.
The whole Chemcor-to-Gorilla Glass story makes me wonder how many random science breakthroughs currently exist but have been waiting for decades to be commercialized. I’m guessing there is a lot. |
The current state of Corning
During the smartphone revolution, some form of Gorilla Glass — which is primarily manufactured in Harrodsburg, Kentucky — has been used in over 6 billion devices. There’s an argument to be made that Gorilla Glass has touched more hands than any other consumer product ever.
With that type of consumer footprint, it’s reasonable to assume that Corning is largely at the whim of Apple’s wants and needs. It turns out that this is not the case. Remember, Corning is over 170 years old and has created glass or ceramic products for many different industries.
If you check your grandparent's kitchen, you may see some of Corning’s staples from the 20th century: Pyrex, Flameware, Corningware or Corelle (though, Corning did sell its kitchen products division in 1998). |
At the time of the iPhone’s launch in 2007, Corning’s largest revenue division was display technologies because thin sheets of glass make really good LCD and OLED screens (TVs, laptops, tablets etc). On a related note, the South Korean electronics giant Samsung owns ~10% of Corning via its Samsung Displays division.
Last year, Corning had ~$14.2B in sales with a new top dog in its revenue mix: -
Optical Communications (34% of sales; $4.8B): Corning invented the first low-loss optical fiber in 1970. The explosion in bandwidth use (video, data, voice) over the past decade has been a boon for this business segment.
-
Display Technologies (22%; $3.1B): The aforementioned LCD and OLED screens.
-
Specialty Materials (14%: $2B): Our old friend Gorilla Glass falls under this segment (used mostly in mobile devices and smart watches). But Corning also makes special materials for the semiconductor, aerospace and telecom industries.
-
Environmental Tech (11%; $1.6B): Mostly solar panels.
- Life Sciences Tech (8%; $1.1B): Laboratory equipment (jars, bottles, pipettes, test tubes and other items found on the show Breaking Bad).
The diversity in Corning's business line looks particularly important when you consider what happened to GT Advanced Technologies, a materials company that Apple contracted to make sapphire screens for the iPhone 6. This partnership was struck in the early 2010s, with Apple loaning $578m to GT to build a plant in Arizona for making synthetic sapphire crystals. The partnership collapsed and GT filed for bankruptcy. It alleged that Apple had broken the deal (the SEC later agreed that Apple was allowed to walk away because GT couldn't create enough quality screens).
Corning’s relationship with Apple has obviously been much more fruitful.
Since 2017, the iPhone maker has invested ~$450m from its $5B Advanced Manufacturing Fund into Corning for the research and development of better screens. Typically, “better” means a combination of strength (does screen crack from drops?) and scratch resistance (self explanatory).
There was a period towards the end of the 2010s during which Gorilla Glass saw very little improvement in terms of scratch-resistance. Meanwhile, the drive to create ever-thinner screens meant that drop-protection was not advancing very quickly (Corning says that if the current generation of iPhone screens were as thick as the first version, the screens would be indestructible). In 2020, Corning and Apple announced a screen called the Ceramic Shield for the iPhone 12 (and future models). It’s supposed to be more scratch resistant and offer 4x more drop protection than previous iPhones. This is why it’s so pricey to replace a screen if it does crack. I’ll shut up and take their word on the science. But just to be safe: I also buy multiple screen protectors and a heavy-duty case for any iPhone (and from painful personal experience, just pay for the Apple Care insurance if you’re buying a brand new one). |
Links and Memes
Elon Musk vs. Larry Page (on AI): Walter Isaacson has a new book on Elon Musk coming out. Time Magazine posted a wild excerpt from it that details Elon’s falling out with Google co-founder Larry Page — they used to be boys — because of AI: They had known each other for more than a decade, and Musk often stayed at Page’s Palo Alto, Calif., house. The potential dangers of artificial intelligence became a topic that Musk would raise, almost obsessively, during their late-night conversations. Page was dismissive.
At Musk’s 2013 birthday party in Napa Valley, California, they got into a passionate debate. Unless we built in safeguards, Musk argued, artificial-intelligence-systems might replace humans, making our species irrelevant or even extinct. Page pushed back. Why would it matter, he asked, if machines someday surpassed humans in intelligence, even consciousness? It would simply be the next stage of evolution.
Human consciousness, Musk retorted, was a precious flicker of light in the universe, and we should not let it be extinguished. Page considered that sentimental nonsense. If consciousness could be replicated in a machine, why would that not be just as valuable? He accused Musk of being a “specist,” someone who was biased in favor of their own species. “Well, yes, I am pro-human,” Musk responded. “I f-cking like humanity, dude.”
In 2012, Elon invested $5m into the AI startup DeepMind. At the end of 2013, Google made a move to acquire the company. Elon tried to block the deal, telling its founder Demis Hassabis, “The future of AI should not be controlled by Larry.” Google ended up acquiring the startup for ~$500m in 2014, which led Elon to co-found OpenAI the following year (he left that organization in 2018). The NFL’s business, explained: Joe Pompliano has an overview of the NFL’s monstrous business including these nuggets: -
NFL did more annual revenue in 2022 ($19B) than the combined sales for Premier League, La Liga, Bundesliga, Serie A, and Ligue 1.
- “NFL games represented 82 of the top 100 most-watched US TV broadcasts in 2022, including 23 of the top 25”
-
“The average NFL franchise is now worth $5.14 billion, according to Sportico. This is a 24% increase from 2022, and every team is now worth at least $4 billion.”
- “Lamar Jackson ($82 million) will be the NFL’s highest-paid player in 2023 after signing his 5-year, $260 million extension this summer.”
*** Here are other baller links for you this week:
“Is Bach the greatest achiever of all time?” Economist Tyler Cowen asks the question in a fascinating post. He provides an interesting set of criteria and tosses out some other candidates (Shakespeare, Beethoven, Plato, Aristotle).
My AI-powered research app**: Bearly AI is the easiest way to access AI-powered tools for writing (ChatGPT), reading summaries (Claude) and speech-to-text transcriptions (Scribe, Whisper ). Use code SATPOST1 for one FREE month of the app's Pro Tier.
Do you use Rotten Tomatoes before watching a movie or TV show? If so, check out this article from Vulture that investigates how people are manipulating the website — which is so influential in Hollywood — by paying off amateur reviewers.
ABBA’s $175m virtual tour: The famed Swedish 70s pop group was digitally cloned to create life-like avatars — or ABBA-tars — for a concert series called ABBA Voyage. Created by Simon Fuller (American Idol producer), it cost $175m to build a special 3000-person concert hall in London for the virtual performances (the real ABBA artists aren’t at the shows).
Since May 2022, the show has made $150m. Tickets cost ~$100 and the show is printing $2m a week (it can keep doing so indefinitely and runs 7 days a week). This model is the future for aging artists but is kind of a depressing when you consider that nostalgia for older music could snuff out new music. Having said that, I effin' love ABBA and want to watch it. You can check out the trailer here.
iPhone 15 Problems: Lastly, the new iPhone 15 will be announced this upcoming week. But all Apple eyes are on China. The Chinese government officials (and employees at some state-owned enterprises) are banned from using iPhones at work over national security concerns. The move is clearly part of the broader China-US trade war and could pose a huge problem for Apple if it expands to the broader Chinese consumer market (~20% of Apple revenue, which is the equivalent of ALOT of Ceramic Shield).
**Promotion of my own app, which means I paid myself to run this ad (and will be taking the money to buy multiple 12-inch Steak & Cheeses from Subway)
|
...here them fire tweets (Xs): |
|
|
Written by me, Trung Phan.
Workweek Media Inc. 1023 Springdale Road, STE 9E Austin, TX 78721 Want to ruin my day? Unsubscribe. |
|
|
|